Showing posts with label best for all. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best for all. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Day 35 – The Politics of the Self




Fellow politicians of planet earth – we have been sorely remiss in our duties and responsibilities to be good stewards to the resources of our planet and good caretakers of the well being and dignity of our fellow living beings – of which the animal and plant kingdoms are equally considered.

To avoid any miscommunication or room for misinterpretation – in this blog when I say “politicians” or “fellow politicians” I do not speak of people elected into governmental offces or people who have career or institutional positions in the various manifestations of “government” in our world. When I say “politicians” and “fellow politicians” I refer to YOU, who are reading this document and I refer as well to myself who is currently composing this document. 

There are many “truths” in our world that are not easy to take in or accept – and here it is necessary for one particular truth to be made abundantly clear if the purpose and intent of this blog are to be practically understood: 

We, the human beings of planet earth are fully responsible not only for the conduct of our governments and our world systems – but of our very own thoughts and our accepted natures. We are at all times responsible for the degree to which we participate in our own living and our own thinking – and in innumerable moments throughout our days we are in fact making decisions that will have a consequence for not only our own lives, but the lives of all around us. 

We, the human beings of planet earth are fully capable and equipped to make of this planet a place of honor and dignity and expression for all life – if we would but dare to consider that there is more to life and living than our personal desires and preferences. We do not stop or allow ourselves the courage to really consider where our personal desires and preferences are coming from and whether or not they actually serve our best interest or reflect our greatest potential if we continue to profess that we want a better world and that we want what is best for all when our actual personal words, thoughts, and deeds paint a picture that is contradictory and often in direct conflict with what we profess to “want” in our world. 

It is remarkably easy to profess and “support” the idea of a better world – a world of unity – a world of peace – a world in which we can truly walk as equals and all have their most important human needs attended to not out of obligation but out of common sense and genuine consideration. It is remarkably easy to say that this is the world we want to live in and this is the world we are willing to fight for and stand up for – that we are apparently “ready” for such a world to come into being just as soon as the government realizes how abusive it is, or just as soon as our global financial systems have a “change of heart” and start valuing things based on actual human values instead of exotic equations meant to seek only profit at all costs, or just as soon as every major corporation begins to take responsibility for the social, psychological, and environmental impact of their businesses – so long as we do not have to take the first step or have to hold ourselves accountable or have to be the very example of what we want in this world – then yes we are prepared to “support” and “be ready for” and “agree with” everything that everyone ELSE should do in order to make our world the place we profess it should be.

It is time to get clear with our starting point and face the actual responsibility that we, the human beings of planet earth have in this particular moment in time and to realize that our fears are not felt alone – that we are in fact equal in our responsibility and equal in our absence thus far.
It is time for us to develop AGREEMENTS with the understanding that who we are and what we have allowed through our own personal interests has lead us to a world of consequences – and that we must find within ourselves the courage to not judge or hold ourselves back due to fear of our own past or fear of what others may think or fear of what may happen if the actual truth of ourselves ever becomes exposed – and in this we must, within our agreement as fellow politicians of planet earth – to never sit in judgment or separation from one another – that we have had as much spitefulness and self interest as anyone else and that if we truly seek to restore our integrity, we must recognize that the same right within all others – to forgive as we would like to be forgiven.

The hard truth of this world is not as simple as a single group of elites who mastermind the world to their own benefit – but that a great and vast majority has allowed this to happen because we have not stood up for each other as equals, but sought only after our personal survival and our personal interest at the expense of all others – which is the ‘mark’ that one can begin to see in all aspects of our world – from our personal relationships, our communities, our corporations, our governments, and the behaviors of our nations.

We as the politicians of planet earth – we human beings – have trapped each other in self-interest and competition as we hold each other to our judgments and our past and in this we divide each other instead of being one united house, one united family that understands that we have had issues and personal conflicts but that such things do not have to define who we are and that through agreements we can actually learn how to give and support each other – that our desires and wants do not have to be fought for through competition when we AGREE that we are better standing together than standing apart – and that we are better stewards and guardians of this world and it’s various forms of life when we face ourselves without judgment, forgive ourselves of that which does not serve us or our ability to stand as a house united, and we SHOW by example that we can take responsibility for ourselves completely and insist that others in our world do the same – and stand here in unconditional support as a reminder that we can let go of our past and our fears and our separation – and whatever ugliness and darkness we must face and expose, we do not allow it to be personal – we do not allow it to anymore define who we are or who we now decide to be – and this we do in honor and integrity one by one starting with ourselves. 

This is the REAL politics of the world and in every waking second our decisions are being ‘counted’ whether we decide to be aware or not. Do NOT allow your actions and decisions to be made for you by self interests that corrupt your political integrity. The world is in danger – and the real politicians of the world are the only ones with the power and leverage to change it. Thus I invite you humbly to walk and investigate the Politics of Self and get to know yourself as your own political body – to assess what decisions and what policies you are making and whether that is making you an effective global politician and an example of life, or whether you have special interests that have lobbied your political interests against your principles – and to ensure that the face you see in the mirror reflects a political body that can be trusted and counted on to do not what is popular or feels good – but what is in fact best for all.


Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Day 20 - The Politics of a Burning Building: The Door to "Survival"




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Burning Building -

Imagine that you are in a burning building along with a thousand other people, and there is only one exit. Above this exit is a sign that says "Survival". This exit to "Survival" is only big enough to fit two regularly sized people at a time, or one large person at a time, or one person with a disability that requires that they use a wheelchair or be assisted by others in order to pass.

You realize that there is limited time before the structure collapses above you and the fires engulf the entire building. If everyone finds a way to cooperate and calmly proceed through the exit to "Survival", moving at a reasonable pace and ensuring that people who require assistance are helped along the way so that they do not become blockages for the rest - it is likely that everyone will make it out safely to "Survival" with some time and effort.

If the people do not cooperate in consideration of each other's common need to get to "Survival" and adapting as a group to meet that need, then there will be chaos, disorder, and panic. Energy will be wasted trying to find or force a path to "Survival" and this will ensure casualties, as well as risking the fires spreading more quickly during the commotion. But those who are first to act on instinct and can fight best, will get through "Survival" first and ensure they are not left behind in the chaos.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Day 20  - The Politics of a Burning Building: The Door to "Survival"


Tonight we are continuing in the series "The Politics of a Burning Building". For the full context of this series, please check out -



Tonight we will have a look at The People Seeking Survival. Here is a recap:


"The People Seeking Survival - This is the dimension of the average person who is now aware of the present danger and must make decisions as to how they will ensure that they can get to "Survival". This is the common majority who now face a crisis that is getting worse by the moment, yet the path to "Survival" is not clear." - Day 19 - The Politics of a Burning Building: Introduction


When people have a common goal - the best and most effective method to attain that goal is through mutual support and cooperation. This is practical common sense that anyone can see and relate to. It is equally understandable then, that when there is a common goal, and yet everyone is competing against each other to attain that goal, the odds of success become much smaller, and greater effort must be expended in competing and utilizing various tactics to reach one's destination - often at the direct expense of the other competitors.

In our story, the common goal of everyone in the building is "Survival". It is in everyone's best interest to reach this goal, and it is understood that there are certain limitations to the structure that the people are currently trapped in which do not allow everyone to immediately reach this goal.  

It is clear to everyone that if all of the people unite and move forward together in a cooperative and smooth manner, where everyone comes to an AGREEMENT about the common crisis and take into consideration that they all value their lives equally and that all would like to make it through "Survival", then it is likely that this common agreement will enable all of the people to move quickly and smoothly in an orderly fashion that will not cause conflicts and blockages that slow down the evacuation of the building, and most if not all people will in fact make it through.

Within such an agreement - even if it is not a unanimous decision - so long as the MAJORITY decide and agree that all have a common goal to reach "Survival" and that the most effective and practical means to achieve that goal is through cooperation and unified movement - then even the most stalwart and self-centered persons in the building would eventually be FORCED to either cooperate and in return have the same equal opportunity to reach "Survival", or they can try and get ahead by pushing and shoving and throwing their weight around - and will only be forced back by an overwhelming majority who see this as a clear opposition and danger to what has been decided as being best for everyone.

All things being equal, and all people possessing equal clarity and consideration, they will easily see that agreement and cooperation will be the most effective and practical way to reach "Survival". With effort, patience, and taking the "risk" of trusting in the cooperation of all, the great majority if not all, are certain to reach their goal.

However, there are many factors in the way of people being able to see with this kind of clarity and be able to as a group make this decision and implement it successfully. Because as clear and effective this solution of cooperation is, there is still an alternative - one that if executed properly, removes the fear and danger and nearly guarantees success, but only for a few who act on this quickly.

There is the possibility for an individual to instead decide to do whatever it takes to reach "Survival" - and within this decision the group is not considered. It is assumed that eventually others may decide to disregard the needs of the group as well, and instead seek "Survival" by any means necessary - so those who abide by cooperation and place their trust in collective support will be easily taken advantage of and left behind.

This is the dimension of the "Survivors" - Who disregard and may even take offense to the mutual cooperation of all, seeing that such a process would severely limit the individual's chance for personal survival, and would require that the group take equal responsibility and consideration which is not likely to happen when there are those who will choose self-preservation first. The actions of the "Survivors" disrupt an otherwise orderly and effective group movement, and in doing so undermines the validity of group cooperation, which is further used to justify "why" it is apparently a good idea to focus on self-interest instead of relying on "others".

But WHY and HOW does such an instinct come about? When it was CLEAR that all would be able to reach the common goal of "Survival" when there is full agreement and cooperation, which allows all to reach their destination and be able to live their lives beyond that threshold of "Survival" - with no injury or conflict - with no jealousy or animosity - with no reason for war or violence -how can it be that any OTHER "choice" be seen as valid?

Are the "Survivors" who react with disregard for the wellness of their fellow man to be considered "bad" people, or is there something about their accepted character that indicates something more going on about "human nature" and what we have accepted and allowed to influence our decision making process in a way that causes us to make bad decisions at the most critical times? These are answers the REAL Politician must answer if we are to contend with the various crises humanity faces today in where the stakes are as real as for those in the burning building.

To understand and be able to answer that question we must look at this next dimension - which is the "Survivors" and see how it is that they would reach such a conclusion, we will continue in blog posts to follow where we will look more in depth about how such a decision can be accepted despite seeing what is actually best for everyone. There is already a very big clue as to how this happens , which can be seen if we again imagine that sign above the exit door - the one that reads "Survival" that everyone trapped in the burning building is hoping to reach - picture this sign and for a moment replace that word "Survival" with the "Money".  Ah!, now that is interesting. The situation has shifted a little with this revelation - the factors are a bit different - but the stakes have not changed. Here we begin to see that the common goal to reach "Survival" can also be seen as the common goal to reach "Money", and this will help our understanding the motivation and decision process of the "Survivors" which will be described in detail  in the blog posts to follow.

Continue to the next segment "Surviving Survival"